The Tribunal Dismisses Certain Sections Of Obi And LP’s Petition

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal has struck out about 17 paragraphs from the petition brought before it by Peter Obi and the Labour Party.

The court struck out the paragraphs for containing “vague and generic allegations”.

A member of the tribunal’s five-member panel, Justice Abba Mohammed, read the lead judgment.

• Read More: The Tribunal Initiates The Process Of Delivering Its Judgment Regarding Obi And The LP’s Complaint Against Tinubu

• Read More: Visual Report: Shettima, Ribadu, Gbajabiamila, And Others In Attendance As The Presidential Tribunal Issues its Verdict

• Read More:  The Tribunal Initiates The Process Of Delivering Its Judgment Regarding Obi And The LP’s Complaint Against Tinubu

Obi and LP are complainants in the petition marked CA/PEPC/03/2023, challenging the election which brought Tinubu to power on May 29.

The petitioners made allegations of irregularities and said they would rely on spreadsheets, inspection reports and forensic analysis filed with the petition during the trial.

But in his lead judgement, Mohammed held that the petitioners failed to show which polling units the malpractices alleged occurred; the number of votes affected; and their polling unit agents who reported the alleged irregularities, and malpractices, among others.

Details later…